
While one might think Kuwait is far more progressive than countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, there are still certain elements there that want to keep women subjugated, and in this case -out of the political realm. It seems Kuwaiti’s conservative Salafis have issued a fatwa calling it a sin to vote for women, in the upcoming parliamentary elections and have called on Kuwaitis to boycott all 19 female candidates. According to Fuhaid al-Hailam,
of the Islamic Salafi Alliance politburo, according to the Salafi’s interpretation of a saying by the Prophet Muhammad to the effect that a nation will not prosper if a woman leads it.
He is calling on the women to withdraw, because what they are doing is un-Islamic. What isn’t un-Islamic, these days, one has to wonder.
The sad thing is female candidates running for office have slowly dwindled- down from 28 in 2008, and 31 in 2006. Perhaps they gave up because they never won, but hopefully this year they will. Then again, women weren’t allowed to vote until 2005!
How’s that for progressive?!
Not sure I would compare Jazeera to Fox, but I won’t argue about the pan arab nationalism. And I’m sure there was a high turnout, and you would probably know better than I, regarding the issue of whether it’s okay for women to vote, but the point of this article is not necessarily women voting but voting *for* female candidates.
I suppose being treated like American women in the 50s is far better than the treatment of women in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc. But again, it’s important for people over there to make sure what is happening in Pakistan, a country that used to be progressive, a country that elected a female leader (Benazir Bhutto)in the past, doesn’t happen in your countries. falling into the arms of fundamentalism.
No serious job opportunities or possibility for advancement. A ”good” woman role is to be in the house, no, strike that, all women. A woman as no identity outside of her role as a wife.
It’s easy to say the ”50s”, oh, how quaint!
It’s something else entirely to remember exactly what that really means. By the way, a man can look at the same situation and go, ”everything seems to be fine here, in some ways women have it even better here than in America”. Give me a brake.
On top of this she must be covered.
Not sure what you are trying to prove here. As you can see I am an advocate of women’s rights actually human rights. So what’s your point??
And what kind of ”brake” would you like?
”Give me a brake” is for Elie. I’d like to hear what Kuwaiti women think of their rights.
That’s a good question...why are they against women’s rights? And Hiram, it is a very good time to start demanding what is your God given rights.. but don’t expect the useless U.N. to help in that regard. It’ll never happen.
Actually, no right has ever been ”given”. All rights must be fought and died for. By people. Don’t rely on God. Only people can get the rights they feel they deserve.
”This is a great example of the American right wing’s ignorance like incognito. We go through entire periods of struggle and turmoil paid for by the blood of activists and then the right wing pretends that they know nothing about this history.”
Ha... :-) talk about ignorance.. I suppose it was the enlightened leftwingers who were out there fighting for the end of slavery and civil rights. did you happen to know the Rev Martin Luther King was a Republican? Probably not. I am far from right wing, other than being a fiscal conservative I consider myself a moderate.
Are you talking about Martin Luther King Jr.’s father?
After the American Civil War the racist south stayed Democratic Party. And Black people, when they had an opportunity to vote, voted Republican. This continued to the 1970’s. So of course all black people in the pre-70’s south were Republicans. Again your ignorant of basic historical facts.
BTW I read your Blog about Perez. Again another republican distortion of history and the law. Private organizations do not have to give freedom of speech. If I said my boss was a jerk or anything else I could be fired.
Our right to free speech is in reference to the government only. The government can not arrest us for our speech but any one else can do what ever is legal to do to punish us.
No.... dear... the Rev Martin Luther King Jr. Go to www.nbra.info and check out the Myth of Republican racism... and see for yourself.
People of such countries should revolt and get out of any such dogmas.
Thankfully, there are some enlightened men in those countries, but not enough to make a difference, and the women are too scared and subjugated to revolt. Plus, some have no problem being treated as a 2nd class citizen, since this is probably all they have known.
No human being has ”no problem being treated as a 2nd class citizen”. If people became used to being 2nd class citizens there would have been no rebellions in history.
Actually, there is going to be a women’s revolution in the Middle East and it is going to be coming soon.
Local Opinions (2)
Global Opinions (23)
Not sure I would compare Jazeera to Fox, but I won’t argue about the pan arab nationalism. And I’m sure there was a high turnout, and you would probably know better than I, regarding the issue of whether it’s okay for women to vote, but the point of this article is not necessarily women voting but voting *for* female candidates.
I suppose being treated like American women in the 50s is far better than the treatment of women in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran etc. But again, it’s important for people over there to make sure what is happening in Pakistan, a country that used to be progressive, a country that elected a female leader (Benazir Bhutto)in the past, doesn’t happen in your countries. falling into the arms of fundamentalism.
That’s a good question...why are they against women’s rights? And Hiram, it is a very good time to start demanding what is your God given rights.. but don’t expect the useless U.N. to help in that regard. It’ll never happen.
Where did you get your information, the republican party? Saudi Arabia is a Kingdom not a republic.
You have hit the nail right on the head!
Not only are women given few rights but, in fact, men have few rights. Kuwait is a monarchy. BTW though a so-called ”constitutional monarchy”, but actually, nothing like Japan or Britain.
Why does the United States help Kuwait? We even shed our boys blood back in the first Gulf War to ”liberate” it from Iraq. All for a regressive monarchy. Why you ask?
Imagine, that all the second and third world nations of the earth were more or less abusive states. If we want their oil or something else, we suddenly make them the poster boy of abuses. It’s all very convenient.
If a leader arises to reform the underdeveloped country, we assassinate him, accuse them of being totalitarian communists and invade.
Then you get Americans saying ”they beg us for help (the old corrupt lapdogs) and then tell us to get out (the people)”.
No serious job opportunities or possibility for advancement. A ”good” woman role is to be in the house, no, strike that, all women. A woman as no identity outside of her role as a wife.
It’s easy to say the ”50s”, oh, how quaint!
It’s something else entirely to remember exactly what that really means. By the way, a man can look at the same situation and go, ”everything seems to be fine here, in some ways women have it even better here than in America”. Give me a brake.
On top of this she must be covered.
Actually, no right has ever been ”given”. All rights must be fought and died for. By people. Don’t rely on God. Only people can get the rights they feel they deserve.
”This is a great example of the American right wing’s ignorance like incognito. We go through entire periods of struggle and turmoil paid for by the blood of activists and then the right wing pretends that they know nothing about this history.”
Ha... :-) talk about ignorance.. I suppose it was the enlightened leftwingers who were out there fighting for the end of slavery and civil rights. did you happen to know the Rev Martin Luther King was a Republican? Probably not. I am far from right wing, other than being a fiscal conservative I consider myself a moderate.
Not sure what you are trying to prove here. As you can see I am an advocate of women’s rights actually human rights. So what’s your point??
And what kind of ”brake” would you like?
Are you talking about Martin Luther King Jr.’s father?
After the American Civil War the racist south stayed Democratic Party. And Black people, when they had an opportunity to vote, voted Republican. This continued to the 1970’s. So of course all black people in the pre-70’s south were Republicans. Again your ignorant of basic historical facts.
BTW I read your Blog about Perez. Again another republican distortion of history and the law. Private organizations do not have to give freedom of speech. If I said my boss was a jerk or anything else I could be fired.
Our right to free speech is in reference to the government only. The government can not arrest us for our speech but any one else can do what ever is legal to do to punish us.
No.... dear... the Rev Martin Luther King Jr. Go to www.nbra.info and check out the Myth of Republican racism... and see for yourself.
”Give me a brake” is for Elie. I’d like to hear what Kuwaiti women think of their rights.
People of such countries should revolt and get out of any such dogmas.
Thankfully, there are some enlightened men in those countries, but not enough to make a difference, and the women are too scared and subjugated to revolt. Plus, some have no problem being treated as a 2nd class citizen, since this is probably all they have known.
No human being has ”no problem being treated as a 2nd class citizen”. If people became used to being 2nd class citizens there would have been no rebellions in history.
Actually, there is going to be a women’s revolution in the Middle East and it is going to be coming soon.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 












Where did you get your information, the republican party? Saudi Arabia is a Kingdom not a republic.
You have hit the nail right on the head!
Not only are women given few rights but, in fact, men have few rights. Kuwait is a monarchy. BTW though a so-called ”constitutional monarchy”, but actually, nothing like Japan or Britain.
Why does the United States help Kuwait? We even shed our boys blood back in the first Gulf War to ”liberate” it from Iraq. All for a regressive monarchy. Why you ask?
Imagine, that all the second and third world nations of the earth were more or less abusive states. If we want their oil or something else, we suddenly make them the poster boy of abuses. It’s all very convenient.
If a leader arises to reform the underdeveloped country, we assassinate him, accuse them of being totalitarian communists and invade.
Then you get Americans saying ”they beg us for help (the old corrupt lapdogs) and then tell us to get out (the people)”.